"Attitude"
Ms
Atwood (born November 18, 1939) is a Canadian poet, novelist, literary
critic, essayist, and environmental activist. She is among the
most-honored authors of fiction in recent history.
It
is to Victoria College that I can attribute the fact that Bell Canada,
Oxford University Press and McClelland and Stewart all failed to hire me
in the summer of ‘63, on the grounds that I was a) overqualified and b)
couldn’t type, thus producing in me that state of joblessness, angst
and cosmic depression which everyone knows is indispensable for
novelists and poets, although nobody has ever claimed the same for
geologists, dentists or chartered accountants. It is also due to
Victoria College, incarnated in the person of Northrop Frye, that I
didn’t run away to England to become a waitress, live in a garret, write
masterpieces and get tuberculosis. He thought I might have more spare
time for creation if I ran away to Boston, lived in a stupor, wrote
footnotes and got anxiety attacks, that is, if I went to Graduate
School, and he was right. So, for all the benefits conferred upon me by
my Alma Mater, where they taught me that the truth would make me free
but failed to warn me of the kind of trouble I’d get into by trying to
tell it - I remain duly grateful.
But
everything has its price. No sooner had I tossed off a graceful reply
to the letter inviting me to be present today than I began to realize
the exorbitance of what was expected of me. I was going to have to come
up with something to say,“You
may not be able to alter reality, but you can alter your attitude
towards it, and this, paradoxically, alters reality. Try it and see.”to
a graduating class in 1983, year of the Ph.D. taxi driver, when young
people have unemployment the way they used to have ugly blackheads;
something presumably useful, wise, filled with resonance and overview,
helpful, encouraging and optimistic. After all, you are being launched -
though ever since I experienced the process, I’ve wondered why
“convocation” is the name for it. “Ejection” would be better. Even in
the best of times, it’s more or less like being pushed over a cliff, and
these are not the best of times. In case you haven’t figured it out
already, I’m here to tell you that it’s an armpit out there. As for your
university degree, there are definitely going to be days when you will
feel that you’ve been given a refrigerator and sent to the middle of a
jungle, where there are no three-pronged grounded plugholes.
Not
only that, the year will come when you will wake up in the middle of
the night and realize that the people you went to school with are in
positions of power, and may soon actually be running things. If there’s
anything more calculated to thick men’s blood with cold, it’s that.
After all, you know how much they didn’t know then, and, given yourself
as an example, you can’t assume they know a great deal more now. “We’re
all doomed,” you will think. (For example: Brian Mulroney is only a year
older than I am.) You may feel that the only thing to do when you’ve
reached this stage is to take up nail-biting, mantras, or jogging, all
of which would be recognized by animal behavior specialists as
substitution activities, like scratching, which are resorted to in
moments of unresolved conflict. But we’ll get around to some positive
thinking in a moment.
“What
shall I tell them!” I thought, breaking out into a cold sweat, as I
tossed and turned night after night. (Lest you leap to indulge in
Calvinistic guilt at the idea of having been the proximate cause of my
discomfort, let me hasten to add that I was on a boat. The tossing and
turning was par for the course, and the cold sweat can be cured by
Gravol). For a while I toyed with the idea of paraphrasing Kurt
Vonnegut, who told one graduating class, “Everything is going to become
unbelievably worse and will never get better again,” and walked off the
stage. But that’s the American style: boom or bust. A Canadian would be
more apt to say, “things may be pretty mediocre but let’s at least try
to hold the line.”
Then
I thought that maybe I could say a few words on the subject of a
liberal arts education, and how it prepares you for life. But sober
reflection led me to the conclusion that this topic too was a washout;
for, as you will soon discover, a liberal arts education doesn’t exactly
prepare you for life. A preparation-for-life curriculum would not
consist of courses on Victorian Thought and French Romanticism, but of
things like How to Cope With Marital Breakdown, Getting More for your
Footwear Dollar, Dealing With Stress, and How To Keep Your Fingernails
from Breaking Off by Always Filing Them Towards the Center; in other
words, it would read like the contents page of Homemakers Magazine, which is why Homemakers Magazine is so widely read, even by me. Or, for boys, Forbes or The Economist ,
and Improving Your Place in the Power Hierarchy by Choosing the Right
Suit. (Dark blue with a faint white pinstripe, not too far apart, in
case you’re interested.)
Or
maybe, I thought, I should expose glaring errors in the educational
system, or compile a list of things I was taught which are palpably not
true. For instance, in high school I made the mistake of taking Home
Economics instead of Typing - we thought, in those days, that if you
took the commercial course most of your eyebrows would come off and
would have to be drawn on with a pencil for the rest of your life -
where I was told that every meal should consist of a brown thing, a
white thing, a yellow thing and a green thing; that it was not right to
lick the spoon while cooking; and that the inside of a dress seam was as
important as the outside. All three of these ideas are false and should
be discarded immediately by anyone who still holds them.
Nor
did anyone have the foresight to inform me that the best thing I could
do for myself as a writer would be back and wrist exercises. No one has
yet done a study of this, but they will, and when they start excavating
and measuring the spines and arm bones of the skeletons of famous
writers of the past I am sure they will find that those who wrote the
longest novels, such as Dickens and Melville, also had the thickest
wrists. The real reason that Emily Dickinson stuck to lyric poems with
relatively few stanzas is that she had spindly fingers. You may scoff,
but future research will prove me right.
But
I then thought, I shouldn’t talk about writing. Few of this graduating
class will wish to be writers, and those that do should by no means be
encouraged. Weave a circle round them thrice, and close your eyes holy
dread, because who needs the competition? What with the proliferation of
Creative Writing courses, a mushroom of recent growth all but unknown
in my youth, we will soon have a state of affairs in which everybody
writes and nobody reads, the exact reverse of the way things were when I
was composing dolorous verses in a rented cupboard on Charles Street in
the early sixties.
Or
maybe, I thought, I should relate to them a little known fact of
shocking import, which they will remember vividly when they have all but
forgotten the rest of this speech. For example: nobody ever tells you,
but did you know that when you have a baby your hair falls out? Not all
of it, and not all at once, but it does fall out. It has something to do
with a zinc imbalance. The good news is that it does grow back in. This
only applies to girls. With boys, it falls out whether you have a baby
or not, and it never grows back in; but even then there is hope. In a
pinch, you can resort to quotation, a commodity which a liberal arts
education teaches you to treat with respect, and I offer the following:
“God only made a few perfect heads, and the rest lie covered with hair.”
Which
illustrates the following point: when faced with the inevitable, you
always have a choice. You may not be able to alter reality, but you can
alter your attitude towards it. As I learned during my liberal arts
education, any symbol can have, in the imaginative context, two
versions, a positive and a negative. Blood can either be the gift of
life or what comes out of you when you cut your wrists in the bathtub.
Or, somewhat less drastically, if you spill your milk you’re left with a
glass which is either half empty or half full.
Which
brings us to the hidden agenda of this speech. What you are being
ejected into today is a world that is both half empty and half full. On
the one hand, the biosphere is rotting away. The raindrops that keep
falling on your head are also killing the fish, the trees, the animals,
and, if they keep being as acid as they are now, they’ll eventually do
away with things a lot closer to home, such as crops, front lawns and
your digestive tract. Nature is no longer what surrounds us, we surround
it, and the switch has not been for the better. On the other hand,
unlike the ancient Egyptians, we as a civilization know what mistakes we
are making and we also have the technology to stop making them; all
that is lacking is the will.
Another
example: on the one hand, we ourselves live daily with the threat of
annihilation. We’re just a computer button and a few minutes away from
it, and the gap between us and it is narrowing every day. We secretly
think in terms not of “If the Bomb Drops” but of “When the Bomb Drops”,
and it’s understandable if we sometimes let ourselves slide into a
mental state of powerlessness and consequent apathy. On the other hand,
the catastrophe that threatens us as a species, and most other species
as well, is not unpredictable and uncontrollable, like the eruption of
the volcano that destroyed Pompeii. If it occurs, we can die with the
dubious satisfaction of knowing that the death of the world was a
man-made and therefore preventable event, and that the failure to
prevent it was a failure of human will.
This
is the kind of world we find ourselves in, and it’s not pleasant. Faced
with facts this depressing, the question of the economy - or how many
of us in this country can afford two cars doesn’t really loom too large,
but you’d never know it from reading the papers. Things are in fact a
lot worse elsewhere, where expectations center not on cars and houses
and jobs but on the next elusive meal. That’s part of the down side. The
up side, here and now, is that this is still more or less a democracy;
you don’t get shot or tortured yet for expressing an opinion, and
politicians, motivated as they may be by greed and the lust for power,
are nevertheless or because of this, still swayed by public opinion. The
issues raised in any election are issues perceived by those who want
power to be of importance to those in a position to confer it upon them.
In other words, if enough people show by the issues they raise and by
the way they’re willing to vote that they want changes made, then change
becomes possible. You may not be able to alter reality, but you can
alter your attitude towards it, and this, paradoxically, alters reality.
Try it and see
No comments:
Post a Comment